AudioMasters
 
  User Info & Key Stats   
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
February 02, 2008, 07:17:44 AM
63224 Posts in 6293 Topics by 2238 Members
Latest Member: LWFN
News:   | Forum Rules
+  AudioMasters
|-+  Audio Software
| |-+  Adobe Audition 2.0 & 3.0
| | |-+  Adobe Audition 3.0
| | | |-+  Using Audition With Other Programs
  « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author
Topic: Using Audition With Other Programs  (Read 197 times)
« on: January 21, 2008, 02:40:11 AM »
Geo Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 113



In the past I've used CEP/Audition exclusively for multitracking and editing but recently I've started using midi and vsti instruments and trying other programs like Reaper and Sonar that seem to handle that better. Cantibile Lite is a nice little vsti host but has limited midi features. I don't really want to stop using Audition, especially for editing individual tracks and mixes though I actually like it as a multitracker, probably mainly because I'm used to it. I'd be interested in finding out how other people manage their workflow when using an additional program for tasks that Audition doesn't handle very well. I'm particularly impressed with Reapers low overhead and it's midi features. So, do you just switch between programs, use rewire, or use Audition strictly as an editor?

G.
Logged
Reply #1
« on: January 21, 2008, 03:06:46 AM »
blurk Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 402



Personally, I generally sequence and arrange in other apps until the track is mostly done, then export multiple wav files that I then import into Audition and work from there.  With my style of music, I rarely need to record from an input, so this approach works fairly well.  I definitely don't bother with Rewire (for starters, the source tracks may be from my Mac).
Logged
Reply #2
« on: January 21, 2008, 08:04:29 AM »
MarkT Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 1504



Yeah, I'm like Blurk. I start with midi and generate wav files in Sonar, then tske them into AA3 and add "live" tracks before mixing etc. Works fine for me
Logged

"Having most of the universe in a form of matter you can't see is fairly embarrassing"

Steven Phillips, professor of astronomy at the University of Bristol
Reply #3
« on: January 21, 2008, 12:12:44 PM »
BFM Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 868



Ditto here, VSTi synths don't even load up in AA3 for me so I am still recording VSTis in FL Studio and importing the Waves into AA .. 2 actually, as like with Vista, I can't really see the point of switching to 3, even though it's installed, nothing much new to bother with (apart from the VST which don't work anyway, making 3 irrelevant to me).
Logged
Reply #4
« on: January 21, 2008, 12:23:02 PM »
gtrman79 Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 20



Now I am the opposite.  I record everything from a mic.  And I was impressed that AA3 was recording 8 inputs at once.  (I was doing a drum kit).  And it had no issues.  I was maybe looking at Reaper to do my tracking, then importing all tracks to AA3 for effects and editing.  Just because of the low mem usage of reaper.  But after doing those 8 tracks, I'm content with AA3.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Ig-Oh Theme by koni.