AudioMasters
 
  User Info & Key Stats   
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
January 04, 2008, 06:32:37 PM
62880 Posts in 6240 Topics by 2194 Members
Latest Member: dyderik
News:   | Forum Rules
+  AudioMasters
|-+  Audio Software
| |-+  Adobe Audition 2.0 & 3.0
| | |-+  Adobe Audition 3.0
| | | |-+  Worth Upgrading?
  « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author
Topic: Worth Upgrading?  (Read 117 times)
« on: December 29, 2007, 02:44:25 PM »
microtouch Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 10



I am currently running AA 2.0 with an E-MU 1212M soundcard and I am wondering if I should bother to upgrade to 3.0?  I use this program for the archiving of vinyl and shellac recordings only ( stereo & mono). I also use several plugins with AA such as Amplitube, CSR etc; and I will be adding ClickFix soon but I don't do any live or multi-track recordings. I was just wondering if I would benefit from this upgrade given my limited use of it?
Logged
Reply #1
« on: December 29, 2007, 04:18:26 PM »
SteveG Offline
Administrator
Member
*****
Posts: 8359



AA3.0 is generally more efficient. So if you have a multi-core machine you will get processing time improvements, especially if you do anything using FFTs. And there's one new process that you might benefit from as well - automatic phase correction.
Logged

Reply #2
« on: December 29, 2007, 04:52:42 PM »
Andrew Rose Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 738

WWW

I personally never liked AA2 for transfer and restoration work and tended to stick with 1.5. By comparison I now do everything in 3.0 and rarely look back. The new tools for FSE work are worth the upgrade alone...
Logged

Reply #3
« on: December 29, 2007, 06:46:54 PM »
microtouch Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 10



Thanks for the info.  Although I don't use a dual core cpu I do employ FFTs for noise reduction and such.  I'll check out the "automatic phase correction" aspect.  Thanks again.
Logged
Reply #4
« on: Today at 02:42:13 PM »
beetle Offline
Global Moderator
Member
*****
Posts: 600



I personally never liked AA2 for transfer and restoration work and tended to stick with 1.5. By comparison I now do everything in 3.0 and rarely look back. The new tools for FSE work are worth the upgrade alone...
  I did the same thing, I have 2.0, but stuck with 1.5 for most of my audio restoration work.  However, I will get 3.0 for the new mastering tools.

Do you recommend the full disc or the upgrade download?  Will the upgrade give me any problems?
Logged

Reply #5
« on: Today at 04:51:13 PM »
MusicConductor Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 1308



You get a full manual and a pretty box with the shipped version. Loopology hasn't changed as far as I can tell, so just downloading the program installer alone is relatively small.  So it really comes down to what you prefer.

Like all other versions of Audition, they get along with each other flawlessly.

2.0 has proven to be my least favorite, and thus least-used, version of Audition.  Like Andrew, however, I'm finding that 3.0 gets the job done better and is more enjoyable to use.
Logged
Reply #6
« on: Today at 05:11:42 PM »
gtrman79 Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 9



I got the most familiar with 1.5 when I used a friends setup.  Then when he wanted it back he upgraded to 2.0 and had LOTS of issues.  Now I just went and got 3.0 about 2 weeks ago.  I am very happy with it so far.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Ig-Oh Theme by koni.