AudioMasters
 
  User Info & Key Stats   
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
November 17, 2007, 08:40:22 AM
62228 Posts in 6164 Topics by 2120 Members
Latest Member: wilbur
News:   | Forum Rules
+  AudioMasters
|-+  Audio Software
| |-+  Adobe Audition 2.0 & 3.0
| | |-+  Adobe Audition 2.0
| | | |-+  Audition 3 'review' in Mix Online......
  « previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] Print
Author
Topic: Audition 3 'review' in Mix Online......  (Read 1895 times)
Reply #30
« on: October 10, 2007, 07:31:17 PM »
SteveG Offline
Administrator
Member
*****
Posts: 8272



...and the truth is you have very little support for your rudness and uncalled-for scathing of the MIX review.

Well not from you, obviously. But that hardly matters, does it?

Basically, if you try and slag me off for it, then I  know I've got it about right...  evil wink

And my view seems to have a little more support than yours does, it would seem. Not only that, but it's based on a rather more substantial knowledge of the subject than yours. And that's why your comments are no more than BS, quite frankly - they're pretty much based on diddly squat.
Logged

Reply #31
« on: October 11, 2007, 12:33:31 AM »
blurk Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 389



Edit: carping removed
Logged
Reply #32
« on: October 11, 2007, 12:50:19 AM »
djwayne Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 1096



Seeing how's Audition 3 hasn't been officially released yet, dontcha think it's a tad bit early for a full fledged, in depth review ??

Indeed.  So why pass off a promo / news piece as a "review"?

So what's your problem ?? You have to throw my words back at me every time ?? You are really getting to be annoying. What's the big deal about a promo vrs a review anyhow.... geez ...get a life.
Logged
Reply #33
« on: October 11, 2007, 01:47:27 PM »
blurk Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 389



So what's your problem ?? You have to throw my words back at me every time ?? You are really getting to be annoying. What's the big deal about a promo vrs a review anyhow.... geez ...get a life.

Yeah, you're right.  In my profession I value precision, but carping on about it here in this context is overzealous and uncalled for.  My apologies.
Logged
Reply #34
« on: October 11, 2007, 02:13:53 PM »
BFM Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 849



...and the truth is you have very little support for your rudness and uncalled-for scathing of the MIX review.

Well not from you, obviously. But that hardly matters, does it?

Basically, if you try and slag me off for it, then I  know I've got it about right...  evil wink

And my view seems to have a little more support than yours does, it would seem. Not only that, but it's based on a rather more substantial knowledge of the subject than yours. And that's why your comments are no more than BS, quite frankly - they're pretty much based on diddly squat.

What a way to reply to a member! Every time you are rude and obnoxious I will pull you up about it ... you are misusing your knowledge and intelligence by presenting it in an obnoxious and rude way. This isn't about whether your comments are right, and you know it. We all know you're right, it's your Pitbull manner that's all wrong.
Logged
Reply #35
« on: October 11, 2007, 08:20:28 PM »
SteveG Offline
Administrator
Member
*****
Posts: 8272



Every time you are rude and obnoxious I will pull you up about it ... you are misusing your knowledge and intelligence by presenting it in an obnoxious and rude way. This isn't about whether your comments are right, and you know it. We all know you're right, it's your Pitbull manner that's all wrong.
When I want the opinion of the 'BFM police', I will ask for it. Until then, button your lip or suffer the consequences of making threats to me based on your own inaccurate and misplaced views. And don't hold your breath waiting either. What I wrote was not rude - there was one sarcastic comment and the rest was simply factual.

By far and away the rudest thing that has happened in this thread is your unwarrented and unwanted intrusion into it. You talk about me being rude? It's about time you looked at your own behaviour, which quite frankly, stinks.


Logged

Reply #36
« on: October 11, 2007, 10:23:10 PM »
Despised7 Offline
Administrator
Member
*****
Posts: 1001

WWW

...3.0 was also mentioned in AudioMedia.com's digital magazine under a list of the "latest DAW updates from the main players".

Logged

Reply #37
« on: October 12, 2007, 06:09:52 PM »
Hart Shafer Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 8



For what it's worth, George has the beta software. As you might imagine, we make sure the press can get a beta *before* we announce so that they can form opinions of it.

--Hart
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Ig-Oh Theme by koni.