AudioMasters
User Info & Key Stats
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
February 01, 2012, 05:47:31 PM
73736
Posts in
7768
Topics by
2596
Members
Latest Member:
paulvincent
News:
Buy Adobe Audition:
Pick Your Region
Austria
Australia
Belgium
Brazil
Bulgaria
Canada
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hong Kong
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Japan
Korea
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Switzerland (Dutch)
Switzerland (French)
Sweden
United Kingdom
United States
AudioMasters
Audio Software
Third-Party Plugins
Vocal Enhacement
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: Vocal Enhacement (Read 2127 times)
«
on:
November 01, 2010, 05:18:31 PM »
keynote9
New Member
Posts: 3
Vocal Enhacement
Hello All!,
I need some help in enhancing some old 2 track mono reel to reel tapes that I have copied to adobe. They are old Garage bands from the 60s and the vocals are muddy and basse to a point.. Most of them are behind the guitars and drums.. I wish I could find the old band tracks and vocal tracks that I had seperate. And some parts of the vocals are so low that I dont know if I can do anything with them...
Any Ideas? Info? etc.. I will try anything at this point..
Thanks
Joe
Logged
Reply #1
«
on:
November 01, 2010, 05:35:46 PM »
Graeme
Administrator
Member
Posts: 2363
Re: Vocal Enhacement
The muddiness is probably best handled via EQ. As for the vocal balance, you may find judicious use of the centre channel extractor will help things along.
Logged
Graeme
Some of my music here
Reply #2
«
on:
November 01, 2010, 06:47:21 PM »
SteveG
Administrator
Member
Posts: 10094
Re: Vocal Enhacement
Quote from: Graeme on November 01, 2010, 05:35:46 PM
As for the vocal balance, you may find judicious use of the centre channel extractor will help things along.
Unfortunately I don't think it will. The OP said "old 2 track
mono
reel to reel tapes..."
Logged
Reply #3
«
on:
November 02, 2010, 03:26:15 AM »
dobro
Member
Posts: 302
Re: Vocal Enhacement
Yeah, can someone educate me about that? Mono and two-track? If it's mono, what's the point of two-track? Is it two tracks, one left, one right, which substitute for a true stereo track?
Logged
Reply #4
«
on:
November 02, 2010, 04:39:26 AM »
keynote9
New Member
Posts: 3
Re: Vocal Enhacement
If I am correct its like saying taking a band track and a voice track and putting it into one. its how they did it in the 60s.. Hard to word
Logged
Reply #5
«
on:
November 02, 2010, 10:31:49 AM »
Graeme
Administrator
Member
Posts: 2363
Re: Vocal Enhacement
Quote from: SteveG on November 01, 2010, 06:47:21 PM
Quote from: Graeme on November 01, 2010, 05:35:46 PM
As for the vocal balance, you may find judicious use of the centre channel extractor will help things along.
Unfortunately I don't think it will. The OP said "old 2 track
mono
reel to reel tapes..."
Yup! Missed that 'mono' bit.
After keynote9's last post, I am really confused as to what it is he really has to work with?
Logged
Graeme
Some of my music here
Reply #6
«
on:
November 02, 2010, 10:33:34 AM »
SteveG
Administrator
Member
Posts: 10094
Re: Vocal Enhacement
Generally, two track recording was the term used to indicate that there were two tracks on a piece of 1/4" tape, but they didn't have to be stereo, or even run in the same direction. There were a heck of a lot of tape recorders built that were only mono, and to use the second track you turned the tape over. In the same way, you got four track recording, only this time it was two pairs in each direction. And that didn't have to be stereo either! On a lot of cheaper early machines you got a track switch, so you could record two mono tracks on each side if you wanted.
But kids recording garage band tracks in stereo or even dual mono? Sounds rather a lot on the unlikely side to me...
Logged
Reply #7
«
on:
November 02, 2010, 11:39:27 PM »
Graeme
Administrator
Member
Posts: 2363
Re: Vocal Enhacement
Quote from: SteveG on November 02, 2010, 10:33:34 AM
But kids recording garage band tracks in stereo or even dual mono? Sounds rather a lot on the unlikely side to me...
I know about the different track formats, it was his throw-away comment about having the band and the vocals seperate at one point that made me wonder what we were really dealing with?
On balance, I agree, if the only available copy is mono, there's not too much that's going to be possible.
Logged
Graeme
Some of my music here
Reply #8
«
on:
November 03, 2010, 12:25:19 AM »
SteveG
Administrator
Member
Posts: 10094
Re: Vocal Enhacement
Er, it wasn't you I was telling(!) - I should have quoted the request from Dobro, who wanted to know.
Logged
Reply #9
«
on:
November 03, 2010, 08:49:13 AM »
Graeme
Administrator
Member
Posts: 2363
Re: Vocal Enhacement
Whoops - silly me
Logged
Graeme
Some of my music here
Reply #10
«
on:
November 03, 2010, 09:10:55 PM »
MusicConductor
Member
Posts: 1747
Re: Vocal Enhacement
For what it's worth, the oldest tapes in my parent's collection were made on amateur recorders beginning in 1950. Until they got a 4-track (2-per-side) machine in the 70s, every tape they have, from a variety of sources, is in the 2-track arrangement with the exception of a rare full-track mono one. For some unapparent reason, we always referred to those machines via fraction instead of number of channels (e.g. half-track or quarter-track ). Also, unless it was full-track mono, the description always seemed to be appended with a mono, stereo, or quad designation.
Logged
Reply #11
«
on:
November 03, 2010, 11:22:43 PM »
SteveG
Administrator
Member
Posts: 10094
Re: Vocal Enhacement
We used to refer to them as either 1/2 or 1/4 track as well, but appropriately appended mono or stereo to this to differentiate, and generally that's pretty clear I think. But I've heard other people call them all
sorts
of different things...
Logged
Reply #12
«
on:
November 04, 2010, 12:24:50 AM »
keynote9
New Member
Posts: 3
Re: Vocal Enhacement
Does anyone have any other questions for me?? I guess all I have to work with is the 20 band EQ?!?
Thanks for all of your comments..
Logged
Reply #13
«
on:
November 04, 2010, 04:54:50 AM »
MusicConductor
Member
Posts: 1747
Re: Vocal Enhacement
You could also mess with multiband compression, but if you've never used it before this sort of project might be a bit too steep. Depends on how detailed your aural skills are. (I wouldn't want to!)
Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Forum Topics
-----------------------------
=> Forum Suggestions/Remarks
-----------------------------
Audio Software
-----------------------------
=> Adobe Audition 2.0, 3.0 & CS5.5
===> Audition CS5.5 AKA Audition 4
=====> Audition 4 Stickies and FAQs
===> Adobe Audition 3.0
=====> Audition 3.0 Stickies & FAQs
=====> MIDI
===> Adobe Audition 2.0
=====> Audition 2.0 Stickies & FAQs
=> Previous Versions
===> Cool Edit 96, 2000, 1.2a
===> Cool Edit 2.0 & 2.1, Audition 1.0 & 1.5
=====> CE 2.0 & 2.1, Audition 1.0 & 1.5 Stickies and FAQ's
=> Adobe Audition Wish List
=> Third-Party Plugins
-----------------------------
Audio Related
-----------------------------
=> General Audio
===> General Audio Stickies & FAQ's
=> Radio, TV and Video Production
=> Hardware and Soundcards
===> Hardware and Soundcards Stickies and FAQ's
=> Recordings Showcase
-----------------------------
Off Topic
-----------------------------
=> OT Posts
=> Polls
Loading...