This may be correct, but I don't understand some things. Recently I open a thread to ask about signal and noise in mono recordings.
http://audiomastersforum.net/amforum/index.php/topic,6390.0.html
Perhaps I also do not understand something important in that thread, but I do see not anything that leads me to believe there is a significant deficiency in the way I convert to mono, which is usually with the Channel Mixer's LR to Mid-Side preset. The other two methods I listed give identical results.
I don't believe my version of the CoolEdit has any ‘phase-extraction' facility.
Do you say that your step 2 phase-extraction process is necessary to successfully remove the stereo cartridge artifacts, that the summing to mono I do is incorrect or insufficient?
Is it in this phase-extraction process that you removed (essentially) everything above 5kHz?
Opening the unprocessed sample, if you zoom in close, say putting the cursor at 0:00.190 and zooming in until full screen is about 25 milliseconds, you see many recurring waveforms. At 0:00.186 is a small click, but most of the cycles in that vicinity appear to be free of clicks. Switching to Spectral View, you see various colors corresponding to frequencies in those waveforms, going all the way to the Nyquist limit at the top of the screen.
I believe, for the most part, those frequencies much above 1kHz are harmonics of the trumpet's fundamentals and/or harmonic distortion, not evidence of clicks or crackle. (
You disagree? based on what?) Above 4kHz to 5kHz, most of the energy may be distortion, but it would probably be similar in a true stereo recording (from LP) i.e. it has nothing in particular to do with this being a mono LP. It would be nice to have something similar for comparison from a commercial CD, but I do not.
For evidence of my beliefs, I look at the test LP 300Hz tracking tracks I mentioned in the earlier post. That may have some some important difference vis a vis results from this mono recordings because, I believe, the test LP is true stereo, simply with identical information on both channels. However, as I don't know any result of that, I plow onward.
Zoomed in, I see vertical color bands in Spectral View, corresponding to the 300Hz waveforms visible in Waveform View, similar to what I see in the trumpet recording. On the lowest level 300Hz track there is almost none of this higher frequency color, on the highest level 300Hz track the color handily reaches 22kHz.
On the highest level 300Hz track, a Frequency Analysis graph shows the 300 Hz fundamental, plus strong harmonic peaks every 300 Hz, gradually decreasing in amplitude, all the way to the right hand side of the display. There are only a few distinct harmonic peaks in the Frequency Analysis graph of the lowest level 300Hz track.
The recording was made from a new LP, thus there is no reason for me to believe it has many clicks or any crackle to contribute to these frequencies higher than 300Hz.
Zoomed in, the waveform view of the highest level 300Hz track has very obvious distortion on the left channel troughs and the right channel peaks. The lowest level 300Hz track just looks like a smooth sine wave.
If I run an FFT low pass filter on the highest level 300Hz track, set at 525Hz (where the 600Hz peak starts to rise in the Frequency Analysis graph), all of the harmonics and the Spectral View color above that cutoff frequency are removed. The Waveform View now show a very smooth sine wave; all the visible distortion is gone.
Since the only difference there is supposed to be between these tracks is their level (+12dB vs. +18dB, according to the LP jacket), the higher order harmonics and distortion in the highest level 300Hz track almost has to come from poorer tracking due to its high level. (
Is there a more reasonable explanation?) The buzzing in its sound is consistent with the instruction's description of mis-tracking. That buzzing is also gone after applying the low pass filter.
In the version attached to this post, I have also done declicking. The declicking is much more aggressive than I would use on all but the worse condition LPs (which this was not). That was followed by two different parameter decrackling runs. While this might not have eliminated everything, it certainly seems to me to have gone beyond anything audible. I then converted to mono by my normal method.
As you can see in Spectral View, there is still a fair amount of energy above 5kHz. My result is easily discriminated from yours in blind ABX tests. The primary difference seems to be those higher frequencies, especially at the ends of the first and third "puffs" although I am not certain this is what I hear. As I said in the earlier post, the sound reminds me of the buzzing on the higher level 300Hz tracks, although it is hardly identical, which brings us back to the beginning, and the reason I asked about mis-tracking distortion.
I guess I now want to know is this is somehow a phase difference effect rather than tracking distortion (or anything else) and that is why it was removed by your processing. I've never done any kind of "fixing" that has had such an extreme effect on the higher frequencies, except a few deliberate low-pass filters, applied only to limited sections, in order to get ride of some bad high frequency noise. If your rendition is truer to the original recording, then I probably need to add something to my LP clean-up regime. I don't have any idea of what however.
I have had similar symptoms on various transfers of stereo LPs, always, or at least mainly, on very high level bursts. That is why I did not make a point of this being a mono recording, nor provide a sample of only one channel.
When something similar occurs on a real stereo LP, is it likely a phase difference/conflict problem? Could it be solved there without destroying the rest of the recording?