Bass frequencies are going to be inherently less directional and the scale is probably logarithmic, or at least not linear . . . which simply means that listening in ambient space (non-headphones) lower frequencies will be more difficult to position discretely.
The transition area isn't really logarithmic - its just the area where there is trading between IID and ITD, depending on the amplitude and timing of signals, and the band in which ITD operates extends up to about 750Hz. But the interrelationships are complex, so the trading band actually extends a little higher than this at some angles. There's nothing 'inherently' directional about bass - okay, it's much easier for it to ignore small objects and roll straight through them - it's the manner in which our ears work that
seems to make it less directional.
It made me think Is there a rule or industry standard for placement of instruments in a recording?
As oretez says, not really. In recent years it's become rather more normal for the bass part of thythm sections, and vocalists to be panned dead centre, with the rest of the rhythm section panned around them symmetrically from this point (simply because this makes for generally acceptable mono, when it's required), but as far as everything else is concerned, all bets are off. I have some relatively early released recordings where the vocal is the only thing on the right channel, and
everything else is on the left. This sounds truly weird in stereo, but does represent the other 'acceptable'(?) way to achieve mono compatibility.