I've been working recently on some early acoustic recordings and trying to clean them up. In the process of removing some of the noise on a track, John McCormack, 1910, mp3 link below, an echo emerged. It is not sonically offensive to my ears and does not appear to have the hollow metallic sound I associate with noise-reduction overkill, but I am wondering whether it is sonic ambiance that was masked by noise or an artifact induced by noise reduction. Other than the subjective judgement of one's own ears, is there a way to tell the difference? If it is an artifact how might it be avoided as I tried to proceed in a quite careful, incremental manner?
A second question that arose in connection with the same file, but not related to artifacts real or imagined is the use of the cool edit/audition click-pop remover, one of my favorite tools but tedious to use by hand. Basically, after I finally isolated, with difficulty, a band that contained most of the periodic scraping sounds associated with an old 78's rotation, the only way I could minimize the noise was to either: 1. cut the whole band out, which I was reluctant to do, or 2. use the click-pop remover, step by step, inch by inch, which was time consuming as well as tedious. So the question is, are there settings on the click-pop remover that would accomplish the same thing? I tried the most extreme settings and the results were not the same. Or is there some other approach that one might apply to a band of noise that would remove sounds like scraping?
Any helpful comments will be appreciated but it is not a frantic rush as working on audio is something I only do on occasion. Thanks.
zipped copies of the before and after files in mp3 format are here; they are small bc the audio range and quality of the track is limited and wouldn't benefit much from less compression.
http://www.mediafire.com/?byyxsgwldhj