| Author |
 Topic 
|
Frostgore
Posts: 4
|
 Posted - Sat May 25, 2002 10:20 pm
|
|
|
Does Cool Edit 2.0 works on WinNT?
|
|
Marco
Location: USA
Posts: 35
|
|
Posted - Mon Jun 03, 2002 12:53 am
|
|
|
Can;'t say anything about NT, but I have CEP 2.0 installed on WIN 2000 SP2, and it works just fine...
Marco
|
|
Syntrillium M.D.
Location: USA
Posts: 5124
|
|
Posted - Mon Jun 03, 2002 10:04 am
|
|
|
Hello Frost. Cool Edit Pro 2.0 will probably run under NT - but if you look at our system requirements, you'll see that it is not one of our 'documented' supported OSes. CEP2 is supported under Win98, Me, 2000 & XP.
http://www.syntrillium.com/cep/requirements.html
---Syntrillium, M.D.
_________________
|
|
|
|
NickAltenbernd
Location: USA
Posts: 39
|
|
Posted - Tue Jun 04, 2002 8:05 am
|
|
|
I tried CEP2.0 under NT on my office machine when I first downloaded it. I get the message that WMVCore2.dll cannot be found in the path, and it gives a whole lot of paths that it tried to find the file in. I sometimes get an error messgae of "Error 126 Loading FLT File wma2.flt" although I now cannot replicate it. When I load the test multitrack session, it takes much longer than on my home mahcine, and shen I play it, I get white noise and a cirsor that runs for a while then jumps back. If I switch to edit view, all the individual .cel files are there, and seem to play just fine. But NT and multitrack don't play nice together on my office machine.
On my home machine with 98SE it runs just fine. This is where I _really_ use it.
I take it Microsoft aren't pushing NT any longer, with 2000 and XP now out. (MIT still uses it on a lot of machines, but they're being replaced bit by bit.)
-Nick
|
|
Zombie
Posts: 281
|
|
Posted - Tue Jun 04, 2002 9:09 am
|
|
|
In case anyone might be wondering, win2000 and XP run on the *exact* same core, XP and XP Pro were made to replace 2000 (which incidentally is/was NT 5.0), to get windows away from using dates on their products (ie: 95, 98, 98SE, 2000, 2000 pro). But there were of course quite a few additions to that base core, which is why XP is pretty unstable compared to 2000 right now, but, they are relatively the same O.S. I got this info from a buddy of mine about a month ago, who programs in C, CC, CC+, CC++, Basic, Visual Basic, Visual C, Assembly, XML, just about everything under the sun, and his company has a sort of *conceptual* partnership with M****Soft...
Edited by - Zombie on 06/04/2002 09:10:36 AM
|
|
jonrose
Location: USA
Posts: 2901
|
|
Posted - Tue Jun 04, 2002 10:34 am
|
|
|
One will also note that Microshlock has definitely slated Windoze NT for the scrap heap, and for some time now... NT Server Support ends on 1 JAN 04, with the phase-out beginning on 1 JAN 03.
That's probably why Synt chose not to chase down every NT issue while building CEP2.
All the best.... -Jon
_________________
 |
|
|
|
| |
Topic
|
All Forums
Windows NT