AudioMasters
 
  User Info & Key Stats   
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
June 08, 2009, 03:47:18 AM
68007 Posts in 7007 Topics by 1904 Members
Latest Member: makman
News:       Buy Adobe Audition:
+  AudioMasters
|-+  Audio Software
| |-+  Adobe Audition 2.0 & 3.0
| | |-+  Adobe Audition 3.0
| | | |-+  Processing Order??
  « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author
Topic: Processing Order??  (Read 200 times)
« on: May 23, 2009, 06:42:39 PM »
tcatzere Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 169



I am currently working on a remastering project that will definitely require the use of these three processes:  Reverb, EQ and SB Compression.  In what order should these processes be applied?
Logged
Reply #1
« on: May 23, 2009, 09:07:32 PM »
oretez Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 605



not proposing this as 'set in stone rule', merely rough sketch approach

generally speaking I tend to apply time based processes last (but as I tend to like 'natural' ambiant interaction among voices I also start with time based 'signatures')

while EQ will can and will alter the impact of compression if used primarily as balancing tools (i.e. to solicite cooperation among voices rather then applied as spotlighted FX) EQ after compression will be far less noticable then compression after EQ

said another way: long before compression introduces extreme artifacts it will alter carefully tune EQ

So, (generally speaking (though reality is on a project I'm both tracking and mixing all processes, fx are executed in racimic flux (a little all the time)) Compression, EQ, Reverb (particularly if you are unable to return to individual tracks).

good luck
Logged
Reply #2
« on: May 23, 2009, 09:37:24 PM »
tcatzere Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 169



Very insightful, Oretez!  Thanks so much for your comments.
Logged
Reply #3
« on: May 24, 2009, 06:07:34 PM »
SteveG Offline
Administrator
Member
*****
Posts: 9139



Very insightful, Oretez!  Thanks so much for your comments.
It's the same processing order you get on all hardware mixers - you have an insert point after the mic pre, where you can insert compression, followed by the EQ, and then busses where you can (traditionally) apply reverb. And it's been done like this for exactly the reasons that oretez alludes to.

If you searched through the forums, you'd find that we've covered all this before - more than once!
Logged

Reply #4
« on: May 24, 2009, 10:04:37 PM »
tcatzere Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 169



Thanks, Steve.  Sorry I didn't dig deeper before posting my question smiley
Logged
Reply #5
« on: May 31, 2009, 01:06:39 AM »
Blair T. Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 20

WWW

I am currently working on a remastering project that will definitely require the use of these three processes:  Reverb, EQ and SB Compression.  In what order should these processes be applied?

I would definitely put reverb last.  That's a hill I usually die on unless I'm trying to achieve a specific or unusual effect.

If your compression is sideband, then if the sideband material itself is EQ'ed, I would place the EQ after the sideband compressor.   If not, I'd put it before.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Ig-Oh Theme by koni.