AudioMasters
 
  User Info & Key Stats   
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
March 06, 2008, 07:59:53 PM
63571 Posts in 6344 Topics by 2284 Members
Latest Member: chelle1002
News:   | Forum Rules
+  AudioMasters
|-+  Audio Software
| |-+  Adobe Audition 2.0 & 3.0
| | |-+  Adobe Audition 3.0
| | | |-+  different mixdown times in Au3 and Cool Edit 2.1
  « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author
Topic: different mixdown times in Au3 and Cool Edit 2.1  (Read 438 times)
« on: January 17, 2008, 11:25:48 PM »
dobro Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 171



Hi.  I do a mixdown of two tracks in Cool Edit 2.1 and it takes 1 minute 20 seconds.

I do a mixdown of the same two tracks in Au3 and it takes 1 minute 50 seconds.

Is this cuz Au's inherently slower at this sort of thing, or because Au's slower at this sort of thing *on my machine*?
Logged
Reply #1
« on: January 18, 2008, 11:05:50 AM »
ryclark Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 325



Or because the Mixdown in AA3 is doing something slightly different and includes more processing/different busses and master tracks etc.?
Logged
Reply #2
« on: January 18, 2008, 11:54:45 AM »
Stan Oliver Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 175



This seems to be yet another observation that AA3 is slower in processing than CEP or AA1.5. There are more reports on (slow) AA3 performance in the Adobe Audition forums.
Logged
Reply #3
« on: January 18, 2008, 01:43:53 PM »
ryclark Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 325



But on the other hand I have found AA3 to be a lot quicker processing some effects!
Logged
Reply #4
« on: February 14, 2008, 10:58:06 AM »
Liquid Fusion Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 1060

WWW

Converting a 2 trk mix 96kHz 32 bits to 44.1kHz 16bits is quicker in AA 3.0 than AA 1.5.

Conversion using highest quality setting: 100.
Logged

Reply #5
« on: February 28, 2008, 04:41:17 PM »
MusicConductor Offline
Member
*****
Posts: 1338



Yes, the algorithm has changed again.  It's one of many things that have been "freshened" and better optimized in AA3.  But if you want drop-dead unbeatable accuracy and terrible efficiency, the sample rate conversion in CEP2.1 is unbeaten, though the sonic benefits are unproven.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Ig-Oh Theme by koni.