| Which do you recommend as my best choice for creating audio CD's? |
| 1A - Record at 96khz, 32 bits, use 32 bit mixing and let the CD software convert to 44.1khz, 16 bits |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| 1B - Record at 96khz, 32 bits, use 32 bit mixing and convert to 44.1khz, 16 bits in Cool Edit. |
|
60% |
[ 17 ] |
| 2A - Record at 96khz, 32 bits, use 16 bit mixing and let the CD software convert to 44.1khz, 16 bits |
|
3% |
[ 1 ] |
| 2B - Record at 96khz, 32 bits, use 16 bit mixing and convert to 44.1khz, 16 bits in Cool Edit. |
|
7% |
[ 2 ] |
| 3C - Just record everything in 44.1khz, 16 bits and don't have to convert. |
|
28% |
[ 8 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 28 |
|
| Author |
 Topic 
|
patb4365
Posts: 11
|
 Posted - Thu Nov 21, 2002 5:50 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
jonrose
Location: USA
Posts: 2901
|
|
Posted - Thu Nov 21, 2002 9:30 pm
|
|
|
Record at 88.2kHz/32bit, 32-bit mixdowns, 32-bit transforms, etc....
Then downsample/convert bit-depth to 44.1kHz/16-bit as the very last two (separate) steps, in that order.
(Obviously, I didn't vote....  )
_________________
 |
|
|
|
post78
Location: USA
Posts: 2887
|
|
Posted - Fri Nov 22, 2002 12:16 am
|
|
|
I didn't vote for the exact same reasons as Jon Rose (including settings). Perhaps you can edit the poll to include more options?
_________________
Answer = 1. Probably.
|
|
|
|
VoodooRadio
Location: USA
Posts: 3971
|
|
Posted - Fri Nov 22, 2002 7:56 am
|
|
|
Hey Post... check out the Poll concerning "magazines" and you'll see where I made the same request. "Webmaster" replied that he is looking into it!
_________________
I said Good Day!
Voodoo
 |
|
|
|
AMSG
Location: Sweden
Posts: 594
|
|
Posted - Wed Apr 30, 2003 4:49 am
|
|
|
|
Most of the times I record at 44.1 KHz 32 bit
|
|
post78
Location: USA
Posts: 2887
|
|
Posted - Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:32 pm
|
|
|
Hey Jon, aren't you using the 20-bit Laylas? Don't those things have a max of 48 kHz?
_________________
Answer = 1. Probably.
|
|
|
|
jonrose
Location: USA
Posts: 2901
|
|
Posted - Thu May 01, 2003 12:20 am
|
|
|
| post78 wrote: |
| Hey Jon, aren't you using the 20-bit Laylas? Don't those things have a max of 48 kHz? |
Yes, they do.
Your point would be.....?
;)
Best... -Jon
Okay....
Since the person who made up this poll seemed more predisposed, in most of their choices, to record at higher sample rates (which their card supports), I just responded in kind.
But in point of fact, I record a lot of this kind of stuff at 44.1kHz/32-bit (well, of course, it's only 20 going in, but you get the idea), which also avoids the odd conversion...
_________________
|
|
|
|
post78
Location: USA
Posts: 2887
|
|
Posted - Thu May 01, 2003 1:22 am
|
|
|
| Quote: |
| Your point would be.....? |
I wasn't making accusations or anything. When you said 88.2 kHz I started thinking that maybe there were versions of the 20-bitters that supported higher sample-rates. My mistake. :)
| Quote: |
Okay....
Since the person who made up this poll seemed more predisposed, in most of their choices, to record at higher sample rates (which their card supports), I just responded in kind. |
I see. Again; my misunderstanding.
_________________
Answer = 1. Probably.
|
|
|
|
VoodooRadio
Location: USA
Posts: 3971
|
|
Posted - Thu May 01, 2003 4:56 am
|
|
|
| Quote: |
| have the CD copying software (Easy CD Creator) convert the file to 44.1/16 |
FWIW, I use EZCD Creator and although I like it as CD burning software, I would NEVER let it convert anything for me. I convert in CEP and then burn. 
_________________
I said Good Day!
Voodoo
|
|
|
|
toodoom
Posts: 7
|
|
Posted - Wed May 21, 2003 2:42 am
|
|
|
Hi!
I tried only with 20 bit 48 khz(aardvark),and it was audible better
when i recorded in 20/48 and then resampled on 16/44.
That's why i think that 32/96 must sound better.
Difference was in sonic ambience-more natural hights.
Hope it helps
|
|
| |
Topic
|
All Forums
Best combination of sampling rate and resolution?
